A platform that answers the four questions a CTO, CISO, or CEO actually asks.
What is exposed. What is exploitable. What is in our software. What is hitting our edge. Same questions every buyer brings to an evaluation, and where most automated DAST products answer one and call it a platform.
Engines you can audit. Tunnel you can run. AI you can override.
17 deterministic analyzers
SQLi, XSS, JWT, headers, components, GraphQL, SOAP, WebSocket, sensitive files, plus an InjectionClass scanner that consolidates 11 detectors. Real engines, not LLM wrappers over a checklist.
Proprietary OAST
Blind SSRF, blind XXE, blind RFI, blind SSTI, blind CmdInj resolved by a collaborator we ship, not a third party your data leaks to.
Outbound mTLS Sentinel
Internal scope without VPN, jump host, or inbound ports. Every analyzer routes through it transparently via TunneledHTTPAdapter.
Four-layer supply chain
Cloud-side passive + premise SBOM + CI/CD gate + signed Evidence Bundle. One coordinated story for OWASP A06, not four point tools.
Exploit Path Graph
Compound risk that single findings miss. Chokepoint scoring on chains, not flat severity.
AI under engine override
The engine's primary_risk_category wins on every disagreement with the LLM. The principle is enforced in code, not in marketing.
What buyers ask in evaluations.
Mapped to alternative patterns, not specific products. Validate every row against your shortlist.
| The buyer asks | What other tools do | What WASViking does |
|---|---|---|
| Does it test modern APIs? | REST only, GraphQL / SOAP / WebSocket as separate paid SKUs | One platform, all protocols, single license |
| Can it scan inside my network? | VPN, jump host, or heavy on-prem appliance with inbound ports | Outbound-only mTLS gRPC tunnel via Sentinel agent |
| How does it handle authenticated scanning? | Manual scripting per scanner | Shared form-login session reused by every analyzer, plus AI Form Autofill |
| Does it find blind-class vulnerabilities? | Third-party collaborator the buyer cannot operate | Proprietary OAST catcher integrated with InjectionClassScanner |
| Do you give me an SBOM? | A flat CycloneDX dump | Four coordinated layers: passive + premise + CI/CD + signed Evidence Bundle |
| Do you watch supply chain in real time? | Manual CVE searches or static reports | Daily OSV + CISA KEV ingest, retroactive match, smart re-notify |
| How do you handle secrets? | Regex-only, or regex + verify with secrets leaving the customer | Local agent, optional verify, only SHA-256 + masked preview leave the customer |
| Do findings come with priority and SLA? | Severity column and a CSV export | Risk Score 0-100, SLA digest, status workflow with audit log |
| Can I see exploit chains, not just findings? | Not at all in automated DAST | Exploit Path Graph with chokepoint analysis |
| Does it correlate adversary traffic to my own posture? | Two separate products: threat intel and DAST | Edge Threat Radar correlated to Findings, with risk amplification |
| Does it speak my auditor's language? | Generic security report | PCI DSS v4.0, LGPD, GDPR, BACEN, ISO 27001 from one rule table |
| Can I prove posture to a customer without exposing my portal? | Send a PDF | Token + password Posture Shares with bilateral audit log |
| Will the AI hallucinate findings? | Often, because there is no engine underneath | Engines detect, AI explains; deterministic engine override |
| Will it integrate with my stack? | Pay extra for connectors | Jira, Slack, Teams, webhook, SAML SSO, public REST in plan |